Switch to desktop Register Login

There was every chance that "The Book of Life", the concluding part of the uber-successful "All Souls Trilogy", won't fulfil everyone's expectations. Just a casual glance at the recent reveals that more often than not readers of first two books expected Harkness to be some sort of machine - to simply deliver a doorstopper each year and to stagnate in the way the story itself is told. However, upon cracking the spine of this massive tome I for one was extremely happy to find out that thing have changed. Since her debut "A Discovery of Witches" originally came out several years have passed, similarly to Harkness, her characters have developed and historian-witch Diana Bishop and scientist-vampire Matthew Clairmont are not the same people they once were. Second book should have been a signal as it was mostly historical fiction. In "The Book of Life" Matthew and Diana feel much more content as a couple and a little bit world-weary. And then there's pregnancy to think about. This latest instalment sees them back in 21st-century France and provides an additional urgency to their search for Ashmore 782. With their united families working (and occasionally hindering their work) together, story is chock full of twists and while not everything was answered clearly I found that enough of the strands were woven together in a satisfactory way.

The thing I liked most about "All Souls Trilogy" was its historical aspect. In her "other" career, Deborah Harkness in an accomplished scholar and personally I would really love to have a chance to read entire trilogy as it is without vampires or witches in it, as a pure historical fiction. As things stand, this series of books was often described as “Twilight for adults” which is somewhat misleading. Luckily, It is much much better than that and to her credit Harkness really knows how to write. "The Book of Life" is a fitting conclusion to the series. It is not bombastic nor filled with spectacular revelations but it makes a great, engaging if somewhat sombre reading. I suspect that, in a way, Harkness simply had to get it out of the way and close this chapter of her career. Personally I'm really eager to find out where she goes next - I suspect we're in for a treat.

Review copy provided by Headline.
Order The Book of Life by Deborah Harkness here:


Before embarking upon reading “Gleam” I was completely prepared for a wholly Gormenghastian experience. Synopsis described Gleam as "an ancient, hulking edifice of stone, metal and glass ruled over by chaste alchemists and astronomer priests" and through his horror novel Tom spoiled me with his panache for creating meticulous Gothic atmosphere so things were moving in the right direction. However, I was quickly disappointed but not in a bad way. “Gleam”, the novel, is completely unlike Gormenghast and fills the same niche as China Mieville's Railsea or Paolo Bacigalupi's The Ship Breaker. In short, it is a character driven road trip through a strange yet familiar world.

First part in “The Factory Trilogy” opens up with the tale of Alan, a man scarred by his past. Alan was born in Modest Mills, a small community bordering the Discard, urban jungle where most of the population lives. When he was just a little boy Alan witnessed a massacre in which entire Modest Mills, apart from him, including his parents perished by the hands of Arbitrators. For some peculiar reason Alan was not killed but taken by the Arbitrators with an intention to integrate him into the Pyramid society - an elitist, utopian half technological, half magical cult community living in stark contrast to Discard in a vast industrial complex with all mod cons. However, Alan never let go of his past and due to his PTSD during his entire life he's constantly been at odds with the authority. He just doesn't know how to be quiet. One day his wife has enough and makes him leave Pyramid to protect his son Billy from the consequences of his actions. Alan understands the necessity of his leaving but still wants to get Billy back one day. However, he's blackmailed by corrupted Arbitrator who prevents him from seeing Billy until he can provide a rare kind of mushroom. Alan has no choice but to embark on a trip into the dark heart of Gleam, a mysterious place called Dok. He's helped by a ragtag band of companions including mapmaker Nora, tattoo artist Spider, Eyes and Churr and straight from the beginning it is perfectly clear that they're not a cohesive team. In fact, each person comes with its own selfish motivations and more often than not they're pulling in separate direction but still, somehow they manage to continuously push forward. 

Their trip to Dok forms the crux of the novel and Tom slowly introduces different aspects to Gleam but admittedly he doesn't really explain a lot. There are hints of familiarity everywhere - genetic mutations and huge radioactive balls - but how does it all fit together is never fully revealed. Still, this is just a first book in the trilogy so I expect it will all be explained in subsequent novel and we just have to accept the strangeness as it is. The other thing I have to mention and with which I had to live with while reading “Gleam” is the fact that there are almost no sympathetic characters in the entire book. Main character Wild Alan is mostly impossible to everyone else and is as selfish as you can get, and the rest of the cast is not far behind. The only relatively unselfish people are Eyes who is quickly put out of the picture and is burden for the most of the story and Nora who is simply different to everyone else but I suppose characters like that are logical considering the circumstances and living conditions. Discard is a truly vile place where, I suspect, it would be impossible to survive without a healthy dose of selfishness.

However, if you can live with the fact that you'll have to wait for the sequels to completely understand the world in which the story is set, ”Gleam” is a very accomplished novel. The tapestry of the Alan's world is extremely rich and is filled with immaculately planned details. The story flows nicely and the last hundred pages or so only made me want to read more. In short, it'll be a long wait for the sequel!

Review copy provided by William Heinemann.
Order Gleam by Tom Fletcher here:


The Book Box Literary Prize was established with a purpose to shine a spotlight on the titles we liked the most in the previous season. The intention behind the award was to fill a box with books that inspired and entertained us the most without worrying too much about genres or themes - create something like a mixtape with all our favourite titles of the year.  The only limitation was that each title had to be received for review in period between 1st September 2013 and 1st September 2014.

Winner of the Book Box 2014 will be announced on Friday, 5th September, 2014. However, in spirit of non-profit nature of Upcoming4.me there'll be no ceremony or monetary award for the winner but we'll make a small donation to charity on behalf of the prize and hopefully, there'll be some increase in sales for everyone included in this year's Book Box*. Our charity of choice is Epilepsy Action and we urge you to donate as well as it's for a VERY worthy cause.

*of course, we'll be treating authors to drink(s) next time we meet.

The Book Box 2014 is as follows:

  1. The Race by Nina Allan (NewCon Press)
  2. Broken Monsters by Lauren Beukes (HarperCollins)
  3. The Miniaturist by Jessie Burton (Ecco)
  4. The Story of the Nose by Andrea Camilleri (Pushkin Children's Books)
  5. The House of War and Witness by Mike Carey, Linda Carey and Louise Carey (Gollancz)
  6. The Enchanted by Rene Denfeld (HarperCollins)
  7. The Truth about the Harry Quebert Affair by Joël Dicker (MacLehose Press)
  8. Gingerbread by Robert Dinsdale (The Borough Press)
  9. The Good Inn by Black Francis and Josh Frank (It Books)
  10. Tigerman by Nick Harkaway (William Heinemann)
  11. Fourth of July Creek by Smith Henderson (William Heinemann)
  12. Memory of Water by Emmi Itäranta (Harper Voyager)
  13. The Rabbit Back Literature Society by Pasi Ilmari Jääskeläinen (Pushkin Press)
  14. The Calligraphy of Dreams by Juan Marsé (MacLehose Press)
  15. White Crocodile by K. T. Medina (Faber & Faber)
  16. A True Novel by Minae Mizumura (Other Press)
  17. How to Build a Girl by Caitlin Moran (HarperCollins)
  18. While the Gods Were Sleeping by Erwin Mortier (Pushkin Press)
  19. The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August by Claire North (Orbit)
  20. The Language of Dying by Sarah Pinborough (Jo Fletcher Books)
  21. Invent-10n by Rod Rees (Alchemy Press)
  22. No Harm Can Come to a Good Man by James Smythe (The Borough Press)
  23. Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel (Picador)
  24. The Visitors by Simon Sylvester (Quercus)
  25. A Lovely Way to Burn by Louise Welsh (John Murray)

The Racehttp://www.waterstones.com/wat/images/nbd/l/978000/746/9780007464593.jpg

https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1392415313l/18498569.jpgThe Story of the Nose

The House of War and Witness18090147

The Truth About the Harry Quebert AffairGingerbread


Fourth of July CreekMemory of Water (eBook)

The Rabbit Back Literature SocietyThe Calligraphy of Dreams (eBook)

White Crocodile17621103

How to Build a GirlWhile the Gods Were Sleeping

The First Fifteen Lives of Harry AugustThe Language of Dying

Invent-10nNo Harm Can Come to a Good Man

Station ElevenThe Visitors

A Lovely Way to Burn


The recipe for my new book, Savage Magic

Where did the idea for your book come from?

It’s never been easy for me to answer this question. I have a flibbertigibbet of a mind that bounces around from one thing to another. Ideas bubble up and sink back down, and sometimes you end up with a foul-smelling soup which no-one would want to eat. But sometimes what comes together is tastier.

So, here are four of ingredients for my new novel, Savage Magic. They weren’t the only four ingredients, but they got me going:

  • a footnote in a book
  • misplaced feminism
  • an amazing story of an extraordinary woman
  • a walk along the Saxon shore

Take one footnote

Writing historical fiction means reading a lot of history.

In fact, it’s in the pages of books by other writers that I find hundreds of ideas. I found this particular inspiration in the back of Caroline Alexander’s book The Bounty: The True Story of the Mutiny on the Bounty. There I discovered a snippet of biography about a very bad man.

His name was Sir Henry Tempest, and he was a baronet who had squandered his own fortune, as Georgian baronets were wont to do. Sir Henry found his own equivalent of a payday loan in the shape of an heiress called Susannah Pritchard Lambert of Hope End in Hereford. He dressed as a gypsy and approached her on the village green, telling her she would meet her future husband that night if she went to the local church. When she followed these instructions, she did indeed meet her future husband: Sir Henry himself.

Women were chattels in the Georgian period. Everything they owned became the property of their husband when they married. Once he had Susannah Pritchard Lambert, Sir Henry had her riches too, and she (and her father) were thrown out of Hope End. Lady Tempest (as she now was) was soon dispossessed entirely by her now-penniless father, and the story goes that she became a street-dweller north of London, known to locals as the ‘ghost of Holloway’.

This story appalled me. It seemed to encapsulate an awful truth that is rather hidden from us today: that women in the early modern era inhabited a powerless world of awful danger, like goldfish in a shark tank.

Add some misplaced feminism

Why misplaced feminism? Two reasons: firstly, I’m a male author, and approaching feminism while carrying the burden of a Y chromosome means taking a due degree of care. The approach I took was to focus on the mistreatment of women by men. Writing about bad men seemed to be surer ground for a male author.

Secondly, because my book was set in 1815, and, frankly, feminism is not something that would have been remotely relevant to the women of that time. But I did have a female character I wanted to push into the foreground: Abigail, the wife of my repeating character constable Charles Horton. Much of Savage Magic is told from Abigail’s point of view, as a patient in a private madhouse in the village of Hackney.

Stir in an amazing woman

My third inspiration was the amazing true story of an extraordinary woman. Her name was Mary Broad. 

Mary was born in Fowey, Cornwall, in 1765. Mary was arrested in Plymouth for the theft of a silk bonnet, some jewellery and some coins - it’s not known how much she stole, but it was enough to make her a candidate for transportation. Mary was sent out on the Charlotte, a ship in the First Fleet bound for the new penal colony of Sydney Cove, in New South Wales.

Mary gave birth during the voyage, to a girl she called Charlotte, the name of the prison ship on which they sailed. When she arrived in New South Wales, she married another convict, William Bryant. Mary had a son with William. They called him Emanuel, a Hebrew name meaning God is with us. Whether the meaning was desperate or satirical isn’t clear.

A year later, Mary sailed into history.

In May 1791, William and Mary took their two children and, along with seven other men, stole a boat and some supplies, and escaped. Sixty-six days later the group arrived in Timor. But William got himself drunk (men, again), and blabbed about the true story in a harbour tavern. His timing was unfortunate - troops from Sydney Cove had just arrived to arrest the escapees. William was shot down by these troops, while Mary, her children and the other surviving escapees were put on a ship bound for England.

Her children died on the way home.

Back in England, Mary expected to be hanged, but her case was taken up by James Boswell and a public outcry ensued. She was eventually pardoned, as were the other four surviving men from Sydney Cove. Boswell gave her an annual pension of 10 pounds, and Mary, it’s thought, went back to the west country.

When I started writing Savage Magic, it was about Mary Broad - or at least, it was about a woman very much like her. Which brings me to my fourth inspiration.

Season with a walk

The Saxon coast runs along the south side of the Thames estuary, roughly from Gravesend to the Medway estuary at Sheerness. I walked it with two good friends, and along the way we came to a little church high on a hill, with a view of the estuary. It’s quite a famous little church because in its graveyard are 10 little gravestones gathered around two larger ones. Ten dead children, buried alongside their parents, all victims, it is thought, of ague (which may refer to a generic fever, or may refer to malaria).

In other words, this may or may not be the church in which Pip encounters Magwitch at the beginning of Great Expectations.

Which got me thinking.

What if Magwitch was a woman?

And from that thought, out popped Savage Magic.

Lloyd Shepherd
Order Savage Magic here:


Because She Loves Me is a psychological thriller with the theme of romantic/sexual jealousy and obsession. After a run of bad luck, graphic designer Andrew meets gorgeous, edgy Charlie and they embark on an intense affair. But then Charlie starts to display signs of jealousy, and increasingly scary and disturbing things happen to Andrew's friends and loved ones. He has to find out if Charlie is really the girl of his dreams – or his nightmares…

This book was influenced by an experience I had when I was much younger. I went out for three years with a girl who had a green-eyed monster living inside her, making both our lives miserable for two years.

Susan (not her real name; all names from this point on have been changed to protect the guilty!) and I got together when we were nineteen. For the first few months, all was fine. Then the first signs appeared. If an attractive woman appeared on TV – a woman wearing a bikini in an advert, for example – Susan's mood would grow darker. She accused me of fancying her older sister, Tara. I didn't, but Susan was convinced. The two sisters lived close to a nudist beach and one day we went there together along with two of Tara's friends – a pair of hippies, one heavily-pregnant, who promptly decided to strip off. Tara followed suit (I should say 'birthday suit') and I, sitting there fully-clothed, didn't know where to look. All I knew was that I was going to get hell for it when we got home, despite my innocence and, ahem, pure thoughts!

Things got worse when we went to university together. She became very controlling, trying to stop me from talking to other women. I befriended a girl from Scotland called Becky. It was purely platonic but as soon as Susan and Becky met, things began to spiral out of control. I endured months of tears, accusations and screaming fits, even physical violence. But because I thought I loved her, because I was young and idiotic, I endured it. I broke off my friendship with Becky, making myself look bad by avoiding her and most of the other women on my course.

I spent a year terrified of going to lectures in case a female sat next to me.  Susan accused me of fancying every woman I met including, on one occasion, a pair of gay women I chatted to in the refectory. She was furious when she found a record in my collection (The Pixies' Surfer Rosa) which had a topless dancer on the sleeve. Another time, Tara and her boyfriend came to stay. After Tara went to bed, Susan tried to punch me in the face because I had "been looking at" her sister.  Ironically, I believe that much later, Susan had an affair with Tara's boyfriend – perhaps revenge for the imagined betrayals.

I knew our relationship was fizzling out, that Susan was no longer interested in me, when she stopped being jealous. We split up at the end of the second year of university, meaning my third year was far more relaxed and happy. I didn't try to analyse Susan's behaviour much at the time, but the relationship left me allergic to any forms of jealousy and possessiveness. If I had been more mature, I would have tried to tackle the issue at its root, to find out why she was so jealous. And if she had accepted that she had a problem, perhaps we could have sought help. I am not in touch with her any more (though her sister recently started following me on Twitter!) and I don't know if she got over her jealousy. I hope she did, because it caused her a lot of pain. Having felt it myself in later relationships, I know what it feels like. No other emotion is as difficult to control or as potentially destructive – to the person feeling it, their partner and their relationship.

Fast-forward twenty years. My psychological thriller, The Magpies, is sitting at the top of the Kindle charts and I am being offered a two-book deal by Thomas & Mercer. My agent tells me he needs a synopsis for a new novel. As quickly as possible. Like, tomorrow.

I had wanted to write something with the theme of jealousy for a long time and, suddenly, inspiration struck. The idea for Because She Loves Me beamed into my head almost fully-formed, along with the title. I wrote a one-page outline and a few days later I had a deal.

I also had a very short deadline. The success of The Magpies had allowed me, for the first time in my life, to write pretty much full-time. Every day I took my laptop to the health club that I had joined for this purpose, sitting in their lounge, the staff no doubt wondering what on earth I was doing. I wrote the whole novel, including the first redrafts, in under four months. Although there were times when I got stuck, trying to pull the various plot threads together, this book poured out of me.

Another unpleasant experience went into this book. Just over a year before I started writing it, I suffered a detached retina. This is where your retina peels away from the back of your eye. In fact, it happened to both my eyes at the same time, although one retina was being held in place by gravity. I was rushed into hospital and underwent surgery overnight. Thankfully, the surgeons saved my sight, but I had to spent the next two weeks sleeping upright with a large gas bubble bouncing in my eye, and taking some mind-bending eye pressure drugs. (At the same time, I was finishing another novel and had to write at least one chapter with one eye closed, barely able to see the screen!)

A couple of months later, I had to go to the eye infirmary for laser treatment on my other eye, the one that was being saved by gravity. The doctor lay me on a couch and strapped on a helmet with a laser attached, like an old fashioned miner's helmet. 'This might hurt a little,' he said.

I will never forget the following twenty minutes. It was like being tortured. The laser penetrated my eye, hitting the nerves, causing the worst pain I've ever known. It was similar to having dental work, when the dentist strikes a nerve – except in my eye! When I came out, I had blood running down my cheek and my eye felt like it had lumps of brick in it. When the doctor told me that it hadn't been wholly successful and I would have to return to endure this procedure again I almost cried.

In Because She Loves Me, Andrew is recovering from a detached retina, and – although I want to avoid spoilers – there is a scene featuring eyes later in the book that was painful but strangely cathartic to write.

I am now writing a book based on a scary experience I had when I went Inter-Railing in my twenties. After The Magpies, which was based on my own experience of nightmare neighbours, this has become my new working process: experience something horrible, then turn it into a book.

I will, frankly, be happy if I run out of things to write about.

Mark Edwards
Order Because She Loves Me here:


What I have always loved about science fiction is that it can remind us of the genuine and often shocking strangeness of the natural world, and that it can do so without losing sight of human fragility, human courage, and the drama of daily human life.  That’s the line I tried to walk in the writing of Burning Paradise, and more generally in all my fiction: something strange, set against something human.

Burning Paradise features not one but two varieties of Something Strange.  The story takes place in the present day, but in an alternate history which resembles our own except that the last century has been remarkably peaceful and untroubled—a world in which the Great War of 1914 was the last serious global conflict.  The explanation involves a different kind of Something Strange: all this relative calm has been orchestrated by a non-human entity for purposes of its own. 

The universe is a big place.  Our galaxy alone is a treasure-box of stars, and most of those stars host families of planets.  If life is common, many of those planets will be biologically active.  Some of them may harbor highly evolved forms of life, perhaps even civilizations much older than ours.  Which means any technology that’s both possible and useful has probably already been invented—perhaps used for centuries and ultimately abandoned, all long before the planet Earth condensed out of the dust halo of our nascent sun.  And if that’s the case, where are these technology-using civilizations or their artifacts?  Why haven’t we seen any evidence of their past or present existence?  That question has been codified as “the Fermi Paradox” (after the physicist Enrico Fermi, who first proposed it).  I don’t claim to have an answer, but Burning Paradise adopts one hypothesis that has long been suggested: maybe the aliens are here, in a form we don’t recognize or which has been carefully concealed from us. 

Maybe that’s because the aliens don’t act or think the way we might expect them to.  Come to that, maybe they don’t “think” at all.  Consider insects: ants and termites build elaborate artificial structures and orchestrate complex social behavior, even though they lack anything we would recognize as moral or intellectual thought.  What if the same is true of our hypothetical aliens?

Which led me (as these airy speculations so often do) down another, entirely different rabbit-hole.  Philosophers have long pondered the concept of what has come to be called “the philosophical zombie,” a creature indistinguishable from a human being but which has no conscious experience, no sense of its own existence, no real sentience at all.  Maybe, I thought, my aliens fall into that category: no more self-aware than termites or spiders, but complex enough to generate plausible imitations of human beings. 

The notion of such creatures as parasites is a venerable one in science fiction.  Many of us first encountered it in one or another film version of Jack Finney’s 1954 novel Invasion of the Body Snatchers.  It’s a deeply creepy scenario, one that gave me more than a few nightmares after I watched the early black-and-white movie directed by Don Siegel (I was ten years old).  But parasitism, scary as it is, isn’t the only option.  What about symbiosis—a relationship between two species in which each gains some benefit in exchange for what it loses?  What would it be like to discover that humanity was already embedded in such a relationship, and that the price of giving it up might be very high indeed?  Would you choose human autonomy, even if it meant the end of peaceful human thriving?

That seemed like an interesting dilemma with which to confront a set of characters (my Something Human) who are uniquely vulnerable to such an alien entity—or who might pose a threat to it.  Cassie Iverson, 19 years old, is one of those characters, along with her aunt Nerissa, an English professor, and her uncle Ethan, an entomologist and author of a book, The Fisherman and the Spider, in which he has encoded certain unspeakable truths about human history.  Because of what they know, Cassie and her family find the whole apparatus of human and alien culture suddenly turned against them.

It was challenging and interesting to write the villains in Burning Paradise, precisely because they aren’t villains in the traditional sense—they aren’t vicious, angry, or immoral.  What they are is utterly and completely amoral: they simply cannot factor morality into their calculations.  Moral choices, for them, don’t exist.  They aren’t inherently violent but they will use violence without hesitation if it appears to serve their purposes.  And it often does.  Which means Cassie and company are literally fighting for their lives, the result being a novel with more head-on action scenes than I’m accustomed to writing.  (One early reader called it my “most propulsive” novel.  I asked twice, to make sure she hadn’t said “repulsive.”)  Creating a plausible, peaceful alternative history of the twentieth century was another challenge.  I worked up a timeline I liked, most of which never made it into the finished book except as casual references to past events, the names of schools and highways, implicit political assumptions, and certain acts of large-scale engineering conspicuous by their presence or absence.  The research itself was interesting and a constant temptation to neglect the act of writing in favor of just, well, learning something—about European history, the geology of the Atacama Desert, Ophiocordyceps unilateralis (the fungus that causes infected ants to climb trees). . .

But basically, once I found my theme and characters, the writing of Burning Paradise was straightforward.  The story more or less carried me along with its own momentum, though not without the inevitable moments of fingernail-chewing doubt and the constant alchemical transformation of despair to elation and back again.  At the copyedit stage my editor asked me to expand the conclusion a little bit, which seemed reasonable, given my bad habit of hinting at resolutions and figuring readers can draw their own conclusions. 

I’m reasonably pleased with the finished product, but what I like best about Burning Paradise is that it hews pretty closely to the elementary relationship at the heart of it: something strange and something human, a story of three fragile human beings and what might be lurking unseen in the deeps of the night sky.

Robert Charles Wilson
Order Burning Paradise here:


TRACING a book's point of conception can be a difficult task for any writer, so when The Last Tiger came roaring out of the Australian bush at me, the shock - perhaps aptly - was a bit like seeing a ghost.

I'd washed up in a sleepy country town in south-west Victoria where I found work on the local newspaper. My previous news round had been Inverness-shire in the Scottish Highlands, a place which couldn't have been more different, except perhaps in one cryptozoological regard. The Aussie bush had no Nessie but what it did have was its very own mystery creature - an officially dead one - stalking the region's collective imagination.

In newsrooms the world over some stories are a hard-sell to busy reporters. The more obviously glamorous tales get snapped up, anything with front-page potential is an easy offload, but the 'crank file' generally gets thrown at those with the least clout or experience. That's pretty much how I managed to get the 'tiger eating out of a dumpster in suburbia story'.

I spoke to a bloke who claimed to have some "totally dinkum footage" of the extinct Tasmanian Tiger. The species was officially declared dead and gone in its island home by 1936 but had been absent from the mainland since rising seas cut off the island 10,000 years ago. After watching the grainy old VHS tape sent to me in the post I duly wrote the story up and the newspaper went to press.

The next morning I had hardly got my jacket off before the office phone was ringing with more claims of tiger sightings. I spoke to a builder who reckoned he'd hit one with his ute during a bush-clearing for a new build. I took numerous 'tiger in the headlights' calls and even had a visit from a tearful octogenarian who recalled seeing a caged tiger touring the district with a travelling circus in the thirties.

"A bloody sorry looking animal, it was," he told me.

There was nothing you might call definitive evidence, but by this stage the mysterious creature had my attention.

The Tasmanian Tiger, or Thylacine, was a wolf-like, pouched marsupial. An apex predator with a 120 degree gape and rows of razor-sharp teeth. On mainland Australia the tiger originally lost territory to the incoming dingo - dingoes are carrion eaters but the tiger only ate its own kill and didn't fare well against the less choosy opportunist. Soon the tiger retreated to its last remaining stronghold in the Tasmanian wilderness.

When Bass Strait opened, separating the 26,000-square kilometres of Tassie from the main, the tiger thrived, for a while. The apple-shaped isle at the base of the continent had a temperate climate, thick impenetrable rainforests and a profusion of the pademelons and wallabies the tiger hunted. Unfortunately, the British Empire also had the island in its sights, and soon the tiger had to contend with the altogether different threat of colonial settlement.

As Van Diemen's Land - the notorious prison island - grew up, the tiger's fortunes changed rapidly once again. After settlement in 1803, vast swathes of rainforest were cleared for cash flocks and nervy settlers grew wary of the perceived threat to their investment.

The tiger became a vampyric bogey man, a threat to livestock that was taken so seriously the government put a £1.00 (£750 today) bounty on every beast's head. Some 2,184 bounties were claimed in the years 1888-1909 (The Van Diemen’s Company also ran a private bounty until 1914) and by 1936 the astonishing and unique marsupial wolf was shot into extinction.

There were claims to the contrary that the tiger clung on in the more inaccessible regions of the rainforests but sightings were scarce and evidence non-existent. An animal whose place on the Earth could be traced back four-million years was gone in the batting of an eye.

The loss of the thylacine is a source of deep national shame to all Australians who would dearly like to turn the clock back. One of their number, Prof. Mike Archer, is earnestly trying to clone a tiger using recaptured DNA taken from a tiger foetus discovered in the vaults of the University of NSW. We are still, however, a long way from bringing the beast back from the dead and in the meantime all that remains is the very potent mythology.

The demise of the Tasmanian Tiger first struck me as a very sad story - a tale of bloodlust and how man's insatiable greed for land tramples everything in its way. The tiger didn't stand a chance against the advancing economic forces - backed by the state - that were unleashed against it. Though an old story, it's one which resonates with the present day. The lesson that we don't know what we have until it's gone is something we seem to need reminding of and this is especially true as the clock ticks towards midnight for more wild species than ever before.

My story, The Last Tiger, doesn't touch on these themes in any casual way. The family at its centre is also composed of strangers in a strange land. Having fled the Czarist occupation of their native Lithuania for a new life, the father, Petras, and his son, Myko, know all about alienation and persecution.

Financial imperatives impose on them too, and as Petras takes work as a tiger hunter to feed his family he falls into deep conflict with Myko, who believes he has found the last remaining den of the threatened species. As Myko tries to save the pathetic breed by releasing them into the most impenetrable reaches of the island his actions become an echo of reports I uncovered of early conservationists who claimed to have done just that.

If some far-sighted environmentalists did try to save the tiger, their actions were admirable, and perhaps, account for the sightings I reported on some seventy years later. I'd like to think the stories are true, that somewhere the tiger beat the odds so heavily stacked against it and survived, but I don't know. I'm just a bloke that writes books, I like stories, and especially ones about magnificent and mysterious creatures that may never be seen again.

Tony Black
Order The Last Tiger here:



      The story begins a thousand times, in a thousand different places. It begins every time I think: “I will remember this.” And then actually remember it. It begins on the street in Damascus when I was fifteen. The sweet stench of trash and shawarma. It begins in the heat on the balcony overlooking the El Jahez Park. It begins when Tareq asks if I like to shoot and shows me a nylon bag full of his dad’s Swiss automatic weapons.

      Other places, other times. The house in Söderköping, small-town Sweden. That awful, never-ending spring. I’m lying on my bed, just reading. I play football, tennis, basketball – sure, all of that. But that’s just stuff you do. All I want is to read. I am thirteen years old and the ending of The Spy Who Came in from the Cold brings me to tears. Not just the night I finish the book, but the whole week. I read it again; I need to understand, I need to crack the code. Within those pages hides the key to how an author can make me feel something beyond the suspense, through the suspense. That’s when I make up my mind. I don’t know it then, but that is when the story begins to grow inside of me.

      Five years later I live in the US, outside of Washington D.C. The schools are closed because it’s snowing and I get to spend a day on Capitol Hill with Alison who is an assistant to some senator from the South, whose name I have forgotten. I really don’t remember much, beyond the fact that she was a Republican and that it didn’t matter at all, not even a little bit, when I stood next to her in the elevator, mesmerized by her perfect American hair, her ambition, and her clear, blue eyes. I felt how that moment grew inside of me and beyond me. How the present wrapped itself around me. How it whispered to me: “You will remember this.”

      Fast-forward several years. I am much older and I have lived in many places, in many countries, on several continents. I feel that the thirteen-year-old-me would have liked that fact. I have a family now. A small, fragile, entirely unfathomable family. It changes everything. The light falls from a totally different angle now and I finally sit down in front of the computer, one night when everybody else has gone to sleep. I am on Rue du Conseil in Brussels, right on the border between the boroughs Uccle and Ixelles, in that wonderful 1930s-apartment, with the rusty, rosebush-covered stairwell leading down to the garden. I open a new document and begin to write what a few years later will have grown to become the book that has just come out in the UK this summer. I don’t even know that it’s going to become a book then, much less that the book will get published, translated, and read all around the world. But I dream about it already that first night, around three in the morning, on the balcony, looking out over the capitol of Europe, shaky with caffeine, ambition, and nicotine.

      That first night is followed by an endless sequence of nights as the document grows, the story unfolds, the code reveals itself before me. The thrill, the chase, all of that which made my thirteen-year-old self begin to read and which I had gathered unwittingly and savored since then. But hopefully also the other things. Those things that made my thirteen-year-old self cry. The grown-up stuff. The real and sad stuff, the betrayals and the language. And now, finally, the book is here. The Swimmer is a spy story that begins and ends in Sweden but, like its author, it moves in all kinds of directions in-between.

Joakim Zander
Order The Swimmer here:


YOU was the project that I started right after I finished SORRY. I was in a kind of lost & found situation. I’ve lost endless nights over writing SORRY and I had discovered a darkness in myself that I really didn’t expect to be there. After 150 pages I got scared by my own story, I put the book away for two years, wrote three children books in between to let the steam out. But a writer has to be loyal to his books and especially to his characters. So I came back and turned one winter into a long dark night. Afterwards I promised myself never to touch the SORRY-territory again. The good thing is, that the idea for YOU was born before I started SORRY and it was coming from a totally different direction - I had five girls as main characters, I knew they were sixteen, in love with their friendship and they didn’t give a shit about anybody. So I let them loose. I also had a mob guy, who never made his hands dirty. I called him Ragnar, he was from Norway and always in control. I gave him a brother, who wrote jingles for the radio and dreamed of being a gangster too. And then I let one of them die and the other turn angry. Last but not least there is this strange traveller, with whom I decided to open the novel. He comes from nowhere, and he disappears into nowhere. In between he is on a killing spree and the body count is so high that I started to doubt my insanity from time to time.

All these characters fit together in a macabre dark way and that is the beauty of the book.

My big inspiration are mainly novels, movies and music. That’s where everything starts. The books range from light to dark, there is no plan behind my reading. I always hope for the best with the writers I adore, but it’s like Russian roulette, you never know if a book is going to hit your or not. And then there is music. It plays a very very main part, because it gives the rhythm to the story. Every part in YOU has its own song reference and if you know the songs and the lyrics you open a second layer to the storytelling. There is always a soundtrack running while I am writing, some days it is full of power and some days it just breaks down to a piano or a cello. I change between bands like Scott 4, Tunng, Misophone, Ghinzu, Sun Kil Moon and Elbow to musicians like Pickering Pick, Thomas Dybdahl, Nicolas Jaar and Devendra Banhart to solists like Adam Hurst, Goldmund, Alan Miceli and David Darling.

The movies give me the editing, the pave of cutting a scene and turning the focus. The big change in TV-series changed my writing too. I learned to give my characters more room to develop.

With YOU I decided to write the whole story in the second perspective, because it turned out that for meit is the best way to get closer to the reader. Some writers like Jay McInerney already used the same perspective but they never used it in the way I thought it should be used: More intimate and closer. I think it is a good aim in writing to get under the readers skin. The challenge was for me mot only to talk directly to the reader, but also to draw him closer to the story. I turn him into the character, by telling him what he thinks, how he feels and where he is going. It gets very personal and as the reader you get the good and the really bad characters at the same time. You have to get through it, no matter what. In SORRY it was only one character written in this perspective. There were people who couldn’t read the novel because it was getting to personal - to identify with a killer, to be a killer. With YOU I open the scope. This book is an entry into over eight minds, it is at the same time a road movie where a lot of bodies are left behind and those who survive will wish they could turn back time and start from the beginning.

The novel has a lot of chaos and I was drawn to it. We did get used to the idea that there is a permanent chaos in our life and it is a little bit like with permanent pain - it stops bothering you, you get used to it and it is a bigger pain necessary to remind you that there is a lot of hurt awaiting you. We are always in turmoil, we are always hungry and greedy and overflowing with love and deep down overflowing with resentment. I think there is no balance, we can’t stay good and righteous, because there are too many people pulling the strings and looking for advantage. They hit us with new damage all the time, and we react with anger or grief but in the end, we go on, we hope for the best and try to adapt to the changes. A revolution would be nice, people just saying enough is enough, people really changing the world and economy and the way we slide down to despair, but we are too domesticated for revolution. We have everything at cheap costs, the phone and the internet and the TV are working, we find free sex on the web, we find cheap friends there too and it is even possible to shit your pants on YouTube and everybody loves you for being so open-minded. That is the new chaos you have to be afraid of. Everything is possible and nobody cares because they hope the spotlight hits them first. That’s the dark side. The light side is: everything is possible. Even the good ones being there and staying there. I am a believer in the good, although there is a lot of bad stuff going on in my novels. Sometimes I think I just have to understand the darkness well enough and everything will turn to light. Sometimes I hope my characters will do that for me.

I am often asked why my five main characters are sixteen. To be honest it is in many ways easier then writing about adults. There is a different rhythm, there is more fun and there is more craziness. You never know what to expect from them. And though I know I am the storyteller, still they surprise me in many ways and often i had to follow their lead. They are definitely my favourites. And that’s a lie that is followed closely by the truth - I really love my characters. Even if they go into motels to kill everyone, even if they hate their fathers, even if they are dead and frozen and still caring.

There is no sure thing where a book of mine will end up. As there is no sure thing where my characters want to go. I know, I can tell them to stray put in one place, but I wouldn’t be a good writer if I wouldn’t give them free rein. At the beginning of YOU I was thinking the whole novel will play out in Berlin. Suddenly I was in Hamburg. Suddenly everything took a very bad turn for the characters and they were on their way to Norway. You can’t predict your own writing. And if you do, you shouldn’t be a writer.

Zoran Drvenkar
Order You here:


“Perfidia”, opening book of the second L.A. Quartet by James Ellroy, arguably the most important crime writer in the world, is simply massive. But if you thought that spreading the story to over 700 pages means that Ellroy lost his edge, you would be wrong. His voice is as unflinching and sharp as ever, even more so. In fact, I would be so bold as to say that “Perfidia” might be his finest novel yet which is a bold statement considering that this is the man who wrote “L.A. Confidential”, “The Black Dahlia”, or the Underworld USA trilogy. But there’s indescribable something about “Perfidia” that makes it different to his previous output. While Ellroy has once again chosen to explore the seedy criminal underbelly of L.A., Perfidia’s historical scope and ambition are simply unprecedented. Similarly to another great American author, Stephen King, in “Perfidia” Ellroy actually tried to connect his entire body of work while at the same time giving his best efforts to write the next great American novel. And you know what? Against all odds, he succeeded.

“Perfidia” is set over a period of only 24 days and takes place during the tumultuous period between December 6, 1941 and the New Year. The Second World War is in full swing and in Pacific and Asia Japan is making huge strides with its military campaign. As the Pearl Harbour is about to happen, in L.A. the largest Japanese community in the USA is suddenly on the ropes. A series of murder or ritual suicides of a Japanese Watanabe family means that among the racial tensions, blackout and war erupting all around them, two police officers, police chemist Hideo Ashida and Los Angeles Police Department captain William H. Parker, are working day and night to solve the case. A note left on the scene alerts to coming apocalypse suggesting knowledge of what is about to come. Along the way they’ll meet many memorable and familiar characters which constant readers will remember from pages of previous Ellroy’s novel. So for example, Dudley Smith and Kay Lake both make a welcome appearance and help with the case.

Ellroy’s stroke of genius is that he has managed to create an atmosphere that constantly changes and continuously surprises the reader as the story unfolds. In fact, it is even hard to pinpoint what kind of book “Perfidia” really is. At moments it is a historical novel, while at others you’ll feel like you’re reading anything from romance to a full-fledged crime thriller. This means “Perfidia” can be enjoyed by both newcomers and experienced Ellroy aficionados alike but for much more fulfilling reading experience I would suggest reading at least first L.A. Quartet first.

In short, “Perfidia” is vintage Ellroy and more. Its story is full of tectonic movements, fascinating and dangerous characters with ambiguous morality, and events bigger than life itself. It’s brilliant in its complexity and vastness. Now, would you please follow me through this descent into darkness that “Perfidia” is? You certainly won’t regret it.

Review copy provided by William Heinemann.
Order Perfidia by James Ellroy here:


Copyright (c) 2014. Upcoming4.me are registered trademarks. All rights reserved.

Top Desktop version